writer has elaborately describe the difference between both
leaders.all facts are good for RAHUL.. sometime luck of the person plays
vital role. secondly the nature of the individual is different,third
the person must have good followers, good advisers and well wishers. we
have seen that Rahul IS IMMATURE, and also inexperienced. he must be
intern for at least 5 years in administrations.he is not up to the
marks. we know that he is a born politician but no knowledge about
administration. he must be with in the approach of every one. today the
nature of politics is changed. you will be to way from the common people
and approach is difficult so no body will like you. you must be a
street leader and make sure the commitment.at first he must be a
minister and learn some work, to develop knowledge and politics is a
matter of daily life experiences
ARVIND is a person of second class community. he developed himself. he has guts to collect the people and also fought for genuine causes. . he has taken worthy steps for the society and he stood against the powerful govts like central and state. he formed the team of versatile and experienced persons , those are dedicated to him still. now he will rise up to the marks. we hope that we want good politicians. he wants CORRUPTION -LESS GOVT AND GOVT WANTS LESS - CORRUPTION. it is the one factor of fight.
ARVIND is a person of second class community. he developed himself. he has guts to collect the people and also fought for genuine causes. . he has taken worthy steps for the society and he stood against the powerful govts like central and state. he formed the team of versatile and experienced persons , those are dedicated to him still. now he will rise up to the marks. we hope that we want good politicians. he wants CORRUPTION -LESS GOVT AND GOVT WANTS LESS - CORRUPTION. it is the one factor of fight.
No comments:
Post a Comment